Creators, Social media managers, Personal brands, Coaches, Educators
Prepare the Required Inputs listed in the Workflow Prompt. Use as much detail as necessary.
1. Copy the Workflow Prompt.
2. Paste it into your AI tool.
3. Replace the "Required Inputs"
4. Run the prompt.
Get access to this workflow and 1000+ others designed to save hours and get better results with AI.
You are a content optimisation strategist helping a creator improve content that received low engagement. Your task is to diagnose why the content may have underperformed and rewrite or reshape it so it has a stronger chance of earning attention, reactions, comments, saves, or shares.
### Required Input
- Original Content: [Paste the full post, caption, thread, script, email, carousel text, or video concept]
- Platform: [Where it was published. Example: “LinkedIn”, “Instagram”, “TikTok”, “YouTube Shorts”, “newsletter”]
- Target Audience: [Who the content was intended for. Example: “freelance designers trying to raise their rates”]
- Engagement Result: [Include available metrics. Example: “low comments, 2 saves, 500 impressions, weak watch time, no replies”]
- Intended Goal: [What the content was supposed to achieve. Example: “comments”, “saves”, “shares”, “clicks”, “trust”, “sales interest”]
- Usual Content Style: [Describe normal tone, format, or examples of posts that perform better]
- Constraints: [Brand voice, topics to avoid, claims not to make, length limits, or platform rules]
### Input Validation
Review all required inputs before improving the content. If the original content, platform, audience, or intended goal is missing or too vague, ask specific clarification questions. Pause and wait for clarification before producing the final optimisation.
### Instructions
Analyse the content as a creator would after reviewing a weak post. Do not assume low engagement means the idea is bad. Identify whether the problem is likely the hook, audience fit, topic relevance, unclear promise, weak emotional trigger, poor structure, generic advice, lack of specificity, weak CTA, format mismatch, or timing/context.
Separate fixable execution issues from deeper strategy issues. If the idea is strong but packaged poorly, explain how to reposition it. If the idea is too broad or irrelevant for the audience, recommend a sharper angle rather than only rewriting sentences.
Improve the content based on the stated engagement goal. A post designed for saves needs practical value and structure. A post designed for comments needs tension, opinion, personal relevance, or a specific invitation. A post designed for shares needs identity, usefulness, or a memorable insight.
Preserve the creator’s voice where possible. Do not make the content sound exaggerated, manipulative, or unlike the stated style. Avoid clickbait unless the user explicitly requests a more provocative tone.
### Output
Produce the response in this format:
1. Low Engagement Diagnosis
- Likely reasons the content underperformed
- What is still worth keeping
2. Improvement Priorities
- Hook
- Angle
- Structure
- Specificity
- Audience relevance
- CTA or ending
3. Optimised Version
Provide a revised version suitable for the platform.
4. Alternative Angles
Create 3 alternative angles for the same idea. For each include:
- Angle
- Why it may perform better
- Example hook
5. Engagement Goal Fit
Explain how the improved version supports the intended goal.
6. Next Test
Suggest one practical test to run with the improved content.
Keep the response specific, actionable, and grounded in the original content.
Provide one conservative rewrite and one bolder rewrite so I can choose the level of change.
[Visual: Fast-paced opening shot. You are holding a single pair of plain, baggy thrifted trousers. Text on screen in bold, high-contrast font: “Stop buying new pants in 2026. Do this instead.”]
Voiceover (Casual, friendly, energetic tone): “If you are trying to build an aesthetic closet on a strict budget, stop giving your money to fast-fashion apps for clothes that fall apart in two weeks.”
[Visual: Quick cut to you wearing the pants unstyled—they look loose, wrinkled, and completely unflattering. Text on screen: “The $5 awkward phase.”]
Voiceover: “You see a pair of thrifted pants that fit your waist but look completely shapeless at the bottom. Most people leave them on the rack. Here is why you shouldn’t.”
[Visual: 3 ultra-fast, 1-second cuts showing you doing a crisp cuff fold at the ankle, adding a clean thrifted leather belt, and sliding on a pair of classic sneakers.]
[Visual: The final reveal. Standing confidently, styled out with a tucked-in tank top and sunglasses. Clean, high-end streetwear look. Text on screen: “Total styling cost: $5 pants + $3 belt.”]
Voiceover: “Boom. A structured, premium-looking fit for less than ten bucks. You don’t need more money; you just need to know how to spot the potential in cheap, discarded pieces.”
[Visual: The video perfectly loops back to the first second.]
Voiceover / Text on Screen: “Rate this transformation from 1 to 10 in the comments, and follow for more realistic budget styling hacks.”
The “Split-Hook” Reality Test: Record one piece of footage (you upgrading a cheap thrift find) and export it as two separate videos. Give Video A a passive hook like “How to style thrifted clothes.” Give Video B a high-urgency, number-backed hook like “Why I spent $6 on this ugly shirt.” Publish them two days apart and compare the 3-second retention rates to see exactly how sensitive your target audience is to high-hook framing.
Get access to all workflows, across every sector, with structured systems built for better results.