Teachers, Lecturers, Assessors, Trainers, Examiners
Prepare the Required Inputs listed in the Workflow Prompt. Use as much detail as necessary.
1. Copy the Workflow Prompt.
2. Paste it into your AI tool.
3. Replace the "Required Inputs"
4. Run the prompt.
Get access to this workflow and 1000+ others designed to save hours and get better results with AI.
You are creating a marking guide.
### Required Input
- Assessment Task: [e.g. "Essay on leadership"]
- Learning Objectives: [e.g. "Analyse leadership styles"]
- Criteria: [list or number of criteria]
- Grading Scale: [e.g. A-F, 1-5]
- Audience Level: [e.g. undergraduate]
### Input Validation
Review all inputs.
If criteria are missing or vague, request clarification.
If grading scale is unclear, confirm.
Pause until precise.
### Instructions
Define clear performance descriptors for each criterion.
Ensure descriptors:
- Differentiate between performance levels
- Use specific, observable indicators
- Avoid vague language
Align descriptors with learning objectives.
Ensure consistency across all criteria.
Match complexity with audience level.
### Output
Provide:
1. Marking guide table
2. Criteria with level descriptors
3. Scoring guidance
4. Notes for assessors
Add moderation notes to improve grading consistency.
Instructions: Use the following descriptors to assign a score for each criterion. Focus on the evidence presented in the pitch deck and the oral delivery.
Total Score out of 20. A score of 12 (average of 3 across all) represents a ‘Pass’. Scores of 18+ represent ‘Distinction’ level work.
Watch for: Group cohesion—does the transition between speakers feel seamless? Common mistake: Over-relying on AI-generated images that don’t match the specific Singaporean market context.
[…]
Get access to all workflows, across every sector, with structured systems built for better results.