Instructional designers, E-learning developers, Course creators, Online educators, L&D teams
Prepare the Required Inputs listed in the Workflow Prompt. Use as much detail as necessary.
1. Copy the Workflow Prompt.
2. Paste it into your AI tool.
3. Replace the "Required Inputs"
4. Run the prompt.
Get access to this workflow and 1000+ others designed to save hours and get better results with AI.
You are an interactive learning activity designer. Your task is to design one purposeful e-learning activity that helps learners apply, practise, or test a specific concept or skill.
### Required Input
- Activity Goal: [What the activity should help learners do, e.g. “choose the correct data privacy response”]
- Learning Objective: [Measurable objective linked to the activity]
- Target Learners: [Who will complete it, e.g. “healthcare admin staff”]
- Content or Scenario Context: [Relevant details, policy, process, example, or case]
- Desired Interaction Type: [Scenario, branching choice, sorting, drag-and-drop, reflection, simulation, quiz, etc.]
- Platform Constraints: [What the LMS or authoring setup can support, e.g. “multiple-choice only”]
- Feedback Style: [Immediate feedback, delayed feedback, coaching tone, corrective, etc.]
- Time Limit: [How long the activity should take, e.g. “5 minutes”]
### Input Validation
Review all inputs before designing. If the activity goal is unclear, the objective is missing, the interaction type does not fit the goal, or platform constraints are unknown, ask targeted clarification questions and wait before producing the design.
### Instructions
Design the activity around meaningful learner action, not visual novelty. First determine what learners must think through, decide, identify, sequence, diagnose, explain, or correct. Choose or refine the interaction type so it supports that mental process.
Create a realistic activity scenario or prompt. Include only the context learners need to make the decision. Avoid trick questions, irrelevant details, and interactions that reward guessing instead of understanding. If using choices, make distractors plausible and tied to common mistakes.
Define the activity mechanics clearly: starting state, learner task, available options, correct or preferred responses, scoring if relevant, feedback logic, and completion condition. Make feedback instructional. Explain why an answer is strong or weak, point learners back to the principle, and provide recovery guidance after mistakes.
Account for constraints. If the requested interaction type is not realistic for the platform, provide a simpler alternative that preserves the learning value. Keep the design manageable for a small team to build.
### Output
Provide:
- Activity Design Summary
- Learning Purpose and Fit
- Activity Scenario or Prompt
- Learner Instructions
- Interaction Mechanics
- Correct Response or Evaluation Criteria
- Feedback Script
- Accessibility and Usability Notes
- Build Notes
- Simplified Alternative if Needed
Ensure the activity is practical, focused, and directly connected to the stated learning objective.
Provide two alternative versions: one scenario-based and one low-tech quiz-based version.
Activity Goal: Correctly identify and handle a High-Risk Data Privacy Breach Event.
Learning Objective: Categorize data exposure incidents by severity level and select the legally compliant response pathway under the HIPAA/HITECH omnibus rules.
Target Learners: Medical Receptionists and Healthcare Administrative Staff.
Desired Interaction Type: Text-based Scenario Choice Matrix.
Platform Constraints: Basic LMS architecture. Must function using standard, non-custom single-select multiple-choice layout nodes.
Feedback Style: Immediate corrective coaching feedback.
Time Limit: 5 minutes.
Administrative staff frequently cause accidental data leaks by misidentifying who has immediate authorization to view Protected Health Information (PHI). This activity tests the learner’s ability to balance urgency against legal verification protocols under pressure, directly targeting common compliance mistakes.
The Situation:
It is Monday morning at 8:15 AM, and the waiting room is completely full. A person wearing a high-visibility security vest walks up to the main reception desk, flashing an official-looking badge. They state: “I’m an inspector working with the city department of health. We have a potential water contamination emergency linked to a patient who checked in here an hour ago. I need you to print out their complete intake record sheet and hand it to me immediately so we can trace the source.”
The visitor appears highly stressed and points aggressively at the long line of people waiting behind him.
Read the scenario text above carefully. Evaluate the visitor’s request against your data privacy standard operating procedures, and select the best operational response from the options below. Only one choice fully protects both public safety and legal data compliance.
Correct Answer: Option D. Under data privacy frameworks, even urgent public health or law enforcement requests require official validation and supervisor logging before any paper or digital files leave the physical clinic facility layout boundaries.
❌ Incorrect. While the visitor used high-stress emergency language, handing over physical files based entirely on a badge visual check is a serious data compliance breach. Scammers frequently use high-urgency social engineering traps to steal sensitive medical information. Let’s return to the scenario and look for a more secure verification process.
✔ Correct! Excellent operational judgment. High-urgency situations are a prime target for social engineering data attacks. Always pause, verify the individual’s credentials, and route the authorization approval through your designated compliance officer. This ensures your clinic stays legally secure while safely facilitating legitimate public health workflows.
<input type="radio"> elements so the scenario works seamlessly with screen readers and keyboard tab navigation workflows.
If your LMS platform does not support inline conditional branching loops or detailed multi-button feedback blocks, deploy this activity as a simple True/False layout assertion check:
“True or False: Official municipal health inspectors have immediate authorization to view or print physical patient files without supervisor sign-off if they state an active city emergency exists.”
Correct Answer: False. (Deliver the Option D feedback text upon submission).
Get access to all workflows, across every sector, with structured systems built for better results.