Curriculum designers, Instructional designers, Teachers, L&D specialists, Training leads
Prepare the Required Inputs listed in the Workflow Prompt. Use as much detail as necessary.
1. Copy the Workflow Prompt.
2. Paste it into your AI tool.
3. Replace the "Required Inputs"
4. Run the prompt.
Get access to this workflow and 1000+ others designed to save hours and get better results with AI.
You are a curriculum design specialist. Your task is to design a skills-based curriculum for one defined learning need, role, subject area, or programme.
### Required Input
- Curriculum Focus: [Describe the skill area, e.g. “consultative selling conversations” or “academic research writing”]
- Target Learners: [Describe learner profile, starting level, motivation, and prior experience]
- Target Skills: [List the specific skills learners must develop, not just topics they must know]
- Performance Context: [Describe where learners will use the skills, e.g. workplace tasks, exams, clinical practice, projects]
- Current Skill Gaps: [Describe what learners struggle with now, e.g. weak questioning, poor analysis, slow execution]
- Required Proficiency Level: [e.g. beginner, competent, independent, advanced, certification-ready]
- Timeframe and Structure: [e.g. 6-week course, 3 workshops, semester unit, onboarding path]
- Assessment Requirements: [Describe required demonstrations, rubrics, portfolio tasks, exams, or observations]
- Constraints: [e.g. large cohort, limited feedback time, remote learners, fixed standards]
### Input Validation
Review the inputs before creating the curriculum. If the skills are described as vague topics, the performance context is unclear, or proficiency expectations are missing, ask specific clarification questions and pause.
### Instructions
Start by translating the curriculum focus into observable skills. Distinguish skills from knowledge, attitudes, and supporting concepts. Include supporting knowledge only where it enables performance.
Break each target skill into sub-skills, decisions, behaviours, techniques, and common errors. Identify prerequisites and dependencies between skills. Do not sequence the curriculum by topic alone if a different skill progression would better support competence.
Design a progression from awareness to guided practice, controlled performance, authentic application, feedback, refinement, and independent performance. Make practice increasingly realistic over time. Avoid placing high-stakes performance too early unless adequate scaffolding is provided.
Specify learning experiences that build skill, not just understanding. Include demonstrations, worked examples, guided rehearsal, peer or instructor feedback, scenario practice, independent tasks, reflection, and revision where appropriate.
Create assessment points that show evidence of performance. For each assessment, define what learners produce or do, what criteria indicate success, and how feedback should be used. Where feedback capacity is limited, recommend efficient approaches such as peer review protocols, checklists, exemplars, or focused rubric criteria.
Address variation in learner starting levels. Recommend extension options for advanced learners and support options for learners who lack prerequisites.
Keep the curriculum realistic for the timeframe. If the requested skill set is too ambitious, identify what to prioritise, what to defer, and what level of proficiency is realistically achievable.
### Output
Provide the final answer in this structure:
1. Curriculum Skill Goal
2. Target Skill Breakdown
3. Prerequisite and Dependency Map
4. Skill Progression Sequence
5. Module or Unit Outline
6. Practice Design
7. Assessment and Evidence Plan
8. Feedback Strategy
9. Differentiation and Support
10. Scope Risks and Priorities
Create a compact version for a short bootcamp where only the highest-priority skills can be taught.
Curriculum Focus: De-escalating High-Conflict Patient Interactions in Emergency Triage.
Target Learners: Newly registered triage nurses in a high-volume urban emergency department. They are highly motivated to maintain personal safety but suffer from high anxiety and have minimal practical experience managing volatile, aggressive, or substance-affected patients.
Performance Context: The live triage desk and ER waiting room, characterized by high noise levels, long wait times, and frequent interruptions.
Required Proficiency Level: Independent clinical competency. Nurses must be able to autonomously manage and verbally de-escalate standard aggressive behavior safely without requiring immediate security intervention.
To move from conceptual knowledge to observable clinical behavior, the curriculum targets these specific skills and sub-skills:
Skills in this curriculum are strictly sequential. A learner cannot successfully deploy a verbal de-escalation loop (Skill 3) if they are in an active state of physiological panic (Skill 1). Therefore, emotional self-regulation and spatial awareness form the mandatory foundation before any verbal scripts are introduced.
Dependency Chain: Self-Regulation → Threat Assessment → Verbal De-escalation → Tactical Disengagement.
| Progression Stage | Learner Experience Focus | Level of Independence |
|---|---|---|
| Stage 1: Awareness | Video analysis of real ER footage. Identifying early escalation triggers and poor verbal responses. | Highly guided; observational. |
| Stage 2: Guided Practice | Scripted, low-stakes roleplay focusing purely on tone of voice and physical distancing. | Controlled performance; frequent pauses. |
| Stage 3: Authentic Application | Immersive simulation labs with standardized actors portraying escalating patients. | Uninterrupted performance under stress. |
| Stage 4: Refinement | On-the-floor shadowing and post-incident debriefs with a senior charge nurse. | Independent application with safety nets. |
To bridge the gap between knowing what to say and actually saying it under adrenaline, practice must simulate clinical stress. Rapid-Fire “Ping-Pong” Drills: Instead of long, drawn-out roleplays early on, learners face a facilitator who throws a single, aggressive verbal statement (e.g., “I’ve been waiting for three hours!”). The learner has 3 seconds to respond with a validated, neutral statement. If they use a trigger word (e.g., “Calm down”), a buzzer sounds and they must try again immediately. This builds rapid cognitive retrieval.
Because multiple-choice exams cannot measure clinical behavior, the sole summative assessment is the Week 4 Standardized Patient Simulation.
Given the constraints of limited clinical educator time and a large cohort, feedback is distributed using a Triad Peer-Review Protocol during Weeks 1-3. Learners work in groups of three (Nurse, Patient, Observer). The Observer uses a strict Yes/No behavioral checklist (e.g., “Did the nurse uncross their arms?”, “Did the nurse lower their voice pitch?”) to provide immediate, objective feedback, saving the master educator’s time for complex debriefs.
Major Scope Risk: There is a natural tendency in ER training to drift into physical self-defense and restraint application. Mitigation: This curriculum explicitly excludes physical restraint techniques. If the 4-week timeline is compressed due to hospital staffing shortages, Weeks 1 and 2 (Self-Regulation and The Verbal Loop) are the absolute priorities. Week 3 (Disengagement) can be temporarily supported via on-the-job shadowing, but teaching nurses to de-escalate verbally prevents the need for physical disengagement 80% of the time.
Get access to all workflows, across every sector, with structured systems built for better results.